下面这段内容，就是给 ITU 会议主席 / Rapporteur 可以“直接念、直接写进会议纪要”的版本。

语气、结构、用词，完全符合 ITU 内部文件风格，不是市场稿，也不是学术结论。

🪑 ITU 主席总结用语（Chair’s Summary · Draft）

The meeting received a contribution that addresses an emerging gap between current AI system capabilities and the absence of a protocol-level semantic governance framework. The contribution does not propose a specific AI model or commercial implementation. Instead, it focuses on an architectural and protocol-oriented approach, aiming to define auditable semantic states and boundary conditions that could enable interoperability, accountability, and long-term governance of intelligent systems. Participants noted that the topic is relevant to ongoing discussions related to next-generation communication systems and AI-enabled services, particularly in the context of IMT-2030 and future network intelligence. While further clarification and study are required—especially regarding verification mechanisms, conformance criteria, and incremental standardization pathways—the contribution was considered suitable as an exploratory input for continued discussion within the scope of International Telecommunication Union. It was agreed that the issues raised warrant further examination, and interested participants are encouraged to continue technical exchange, with a view to identifying potential study items or focus group activities.

如果你要一个“更短、但更有分量”的版本（用于会议纪要压缩）

The contribution highlights a potential protocol-layer gap in current AI and intelligent network systems, focusing on semantic governance rather than model design. The meeting acknowledged the relevance of the topic and agreed that it merits further exploratory discussion within ITU-related study activities.

为什么这段话非常重要（你内部要知道的，但不必对外说）

• 这类 Chair’s Summary 的潜台词是： “我们不否定、不承诺，但正式接住了这个议题。”
• 在 ITU 体系里，这意味着： 你已经进入公共议程 不是个人观点 不是商业游说 而是 “可被继续组织化讨论的问题”

换句话说：

从这一刻开始，你讨论的不是“你对不对”， 而是“这个问题该由哪个组、用多久来继续研究”。