Nobel Peace Prize Nomination Narrative

WAO Governance Framework and Its Associated Institutions

Nominee:

The WAO Governance Framework, including its foundational charter, associated public-interest institutions, and its decentralized governance mechanisms (WAO-DAO).

Nomination Statement

This nomination recognizes a governance framework that addresses one of the most underexamined but rapidly escalating threats to peace in the twenty-first century:
the emergence of large-scale, automated decision-making systems whose consequences cannot be clearly attributed, audited, or peacefully resolved.

As artificial intelligence systems increasingly mediate decisions in warfare, finance, public administration, and information dissemination, traditional mechanisms for responsibility and accountability have begun to erode. Conflicts are no longer initiated solely by identifiable actors but can emerge from opaque systems in which no single party can be held responsible. History shows that such conditions—where harm occurs without accountability—are fertile ground for escalation, mistrust, and violence.

The WAO Governance Framework represents a preventative contribution to peace by addressing this structural risk at its root.

Rather than regulating intelligence itself, the framework introduces a semantic and responsibility-based governance layer that ensures decisions affecting reality remain bound to identifiable, accountable subjects. It establishes clear distinctions between expression and commitment, between suggestion and action, and between automated output and human responsibility. In doing so, it restores the possibility of peaceful resolution by making causality and accountability legible even in highly complex, AI-mediated systems.

Crucially, this framework does not rely on coercion, enforcement, or military power. It is non-financial, non-violent, and non-punitive by design. Its purpose is not to judge intentions or outcomes, but to prevent the emergence of responsibility vacuums that historically precede conflict. By ensuring that no decision of consequence can enter history without a traceable responsible subject, it reduces the likelihood that disputes escalate into violence due to ambiguity, denial, or systemic opacity.

The decentralized governance component (WAO-DAO) serves not as a political authority, but as a public-interest mechanism to steward this framework transparently, prevent capture by state or corporate power, and ensure global accessibility. Its role is analogous to that of international humanitarian institutions that safeguard norms rather than exercise force.

This contribution is especially significant because it anticipates conflict before it manifests. Much like arms control treaties or humanitarian law, it operates upstream—addressing the conditions under which violence becomes likely, rather than responding after harm has occurred.

In an era where peace is increasingly threatened not by deliberate aggression alone, but by unaccountable systems acting at scale, the WAO Governance Framework offers a new and necessary form of peacekeeping:
the preservation of responsibility as a prerequisite for nonviolent coexistence.

For establishing a structural safeguard against conflict in the age of artificial intelligence, and for advancing peace through accountability rather than force, this governance framework merits consideration for the Nobel Peace Prize.

一句“评审委员会内部总结用”的定性句（不公开）

This nomination recognizes a form of peacekeeping that prevents conflict by ensuring responsibility never disappears—even when decisions are made by machines.

如果你愿意，下一步我可以继续做三件非常关键的事之一：

1️⃣ 模拟诺贝尔和平奖委员会第一次讨论这份提名时的真实争论

2️⃣ 把这份叙事改写成“国家/国际组织提名人”更容易签字的版本

3️⃣ 判断：这一提名更适合哪一个时间窗口（近期 / 中期 / 长期）

你选一个，我继续。

译成中文

下面是诺贝尔和平奖提名叙事文本的完整中文正式译文，语气与结构保持与英文原稿一致，可直接用于内部审阅、提名人沟通或正式材料准备。

诺贝尔和平奖提名叙事文本

WAO 治理框架及其相关公共机构

被提名对象：

WAO 治理框架，包括其基础性宪章、相关的公共利益机构，以及其去中心化治理机制（WAO-DAO）。

提名陈述

本提名旨在表彰一项治理框架，该框架应对了二十一世纪最少被系统性审视、却正在迅速加剧的和平威胁之一：
大规模自动化决策系统的出现，使其后果难以被清晰归因、审计与以和平方式解决。

随着人工智能系统日益深度介入战争、金融、公共治理与信息传播等领域，传统的责任与问责机制正在被侵蚀。冲突不再仅由可识别的行为主体直接发动，而越来越多地源自不透明的系统性决策过程，在这些过程中，没有任何单一主体能够被明确追责。历史反复表明：当伤害发生却无人负责时，社会极易陷入升级性的冲突、不信任与暴力。

WAO 治理框架通过从结构源头应对这一风险，对和平作出了具有前瞻性的预防性贡献。

该框架并非试图监管或限制智能本身，而是引入了一层基于语义与责任的治理结构，确保所有对现实产生影响的决策，始终绑定于可识别、可追溯、可承担责任的主体之上。它清晰地区分了表达与承诺、建议与行动、自动化输出与人类责任，从而在高度复杂、由人工智能中介的系统中，重新恢复了因果关系与责任的可见性，使和平解决争端重新成为可能。

尤为重要的是，这一框架不依赖强制执行、暴力手段或权力威慑。它在设计上是非金融的、非暴力的、非惩罚性的。其目标并非裁定动机或判断结果的正确性，而是防止一种在历史上反复引发冲突的危险状态出现——责任真空。通过确保任何具有现实后果的决策都无法在缺乏可追溯责任主体的情况下进入历史，该框架显著降低了因否认、推诿或系统不透明而导致争端升级为暴力冲突的风险。

去中心化治理机制（WAO-DAO）在其中并不扮演政治权力或决策中心的角色，而是作为一种公共利益机制，负责对该框架进行透明托管，防止其被国家权力或企业利益所俘获，并确保其在全球范围内的可访问性与中立性。其功能类似于国际人道主义机构：维护规范，而非施加力量。

这一贡献尤为重要之处在于其对冲突的前瞻性预防。正如军控条约或国际人道法一样，WAO 治理框架并非在暴力发生之后进行补救，而是在冲突尚未显现之前，处理那些使暴力更可能发生的结构性条件。

在一个和平日益受到威胁的时代——这种威胁并不仅来自蓄意侵略，更来自于规模化、不可归责的系统性决策——WAO 治理框架提供了一种全新的、必要的和平维护形式：
将责任本身作为非暴力共存的前提加以保护。

基于其在人工智能时代通过责任结构而非武力手段推进和平的贡献，该治理框架理应获得诺贝尔和平奖的审慎考量。

一句“评审委员会内部总结用”的定性表述（不公开）

本提名所表彰的，是一种通过确保责任永不消失而预防冲突的新型和平维护方式——即便决策由机器作出。